Monthly Archives: April 2013

And Tony Abbott still thinks Climate Change is Crap!

Talk about an Ostrich putting its head into the sand!!!

And he wants to be the next Prime Minister!!!

Of what!

Once the earth’s climate is fucked, so are all its living things, including dumbshit Abbott supporters!
————————————————————————

Greenhouse gases in new danger zone

Date
April 29, 2013

The world’s carbon dioxide levels are on the cusp of reaching 400 parts per million in the atmosphere for the first time in 3 million years.

The daily CO2 level, measured at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, stood at 399.72 parts per million last Thursday, and a few hourly readings had already risen above 400 parts per million.

”I wish it weren’t true, but it looks like the world is going to blow through the 400 ppm level without losing a beat,” said Ralph Keeling, a geochemist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in the US, which operates the Hawaiian observatory. ”At this pace we’ll hit 450 ppm within a few decades.”

The 450 parts per million level is considered the point where the world has a 50 per cent chance of avoiding dangerous climate change – any higher, and the odds of avoiding searing temperature rises of four or five degrees by the end of the century become prohibitively risky.

The rise in greenhouse gases corresponds with the extra CO2 emitted by human activities such as burning fossil fuels and cutting down forests. More greenhouse gases mean more heat builds up at the Earth’s surface.

The last time CO2 reached the symbolic milestone of 400 parts per million in the atmosphere – in the Pliocene era – temperatures rose three to four degrees and sea levels were between five and 40 metres higher than they are today. Carbon dioxide levels have been increasing since the first measurements at the observatory in 1958 recorded 317 parts per million.

Levels above 400 parts per million have already been breached at a few polar monitoring stations in the past year.

It comes as Australia’s Climate Commission will release a report on Monday on global action to reduce emissions. The US and, particularly, China were moving into leadership positions on greenhouse gas cuts, according to the report, The Critical Decade: Global Action Building on Climate Change.

Growth in coal use in China had declined substantially and renewable energy had expanded on a massive scale, it said. Its wind power generation had increased almost 50-fold between 2005 and 2012, solar power capacity rose by 75 per cent last year.

Australia doubled its renewable energy capacity between 2001 and 2012, but was at some risk of being left behind by other nations, according to the chief of the Climate Commission, Tim Flannery.

”We are the 15th largest emitter in the world, larger than 180 other countries,” Professor Flannery said. ”We are more influential than most of us think.”

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/greenhouse-gases-in-new-danger-zone-20130428-2imjm.html#ixzz2RlsuKg9e

Organic food wins!

Flying in the face of the organic debate

Date
April 25, 2013 – 10:17AM

Unlikely as it may sound, a 16-year-old’s school science project has added weight to the organic versus conventional debate.

Adding weight to the organic debate: the humble fruit fly.Adding weight to the organic debate: the humble fruit fly. Photo: California Institute of Technolo

A 16-year-old’s school science project has added weight to the argument that eating organically has greater health benefits than eating conventionally-grown foods.

Ria Chhabra overheard her parents debating the topic and decided to see if she could find out the answer for herself, the New York Times reports.

To test whether organically grown food provides greater health benefits than its conventionally grown counterpart, Chhabra turned to fruit flies; they have around 75 per cent of the genes that cause disease in humans and have a short life span so a variety of biological factors can be studied in a reasonably short period of time.

Her experiment was conducted over her summer break with the help of an assistant professor and a researcher at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. It won her top honours in a national science competition and has now been published in the respected Plos One journal.

Half of the flies in the experiment were fed an organic diet and the other half a conventional one. She then tested levels of fertility, stress resistance, physical activity and longevity.

They found that eating organically improved levels on virtually all fronts.

“These data suggest that organic foods are more nutritionally balanced than conventional foods, or contain higher levels of nutrients, leading to improved fertility and longevity,” they said.

Similarly, flies on the organic diet were more active and had greater stress resistance.

The main exception to these findings was that the diet had to be balanced. Flies that were fed only one type of organic food had shorter lifespans and were less fertile than those fed a balanced conventional diet.

While the results are by no means conclusive and cannot be extended to humans, they certainly call for further study, particularly given that organics, worth over 1.2 billion a year, is one of Australia’s top five growth industries.

Previous studies on organic versus conventional have had conflicting results in terms of nutritional or health benefits. This is significant considering the price difference between organic and conventionally farmed foods. A recent analysis of supermarket prices by Suncorp Bank found that organic food is 79 per cent more expensive than conventional.

One major study by Stanford University last year found: “There isn’t much difference between organic and conventional foods, if you’re an adult and making a decision based solely on your health.”

Yet, the majority of studies and meta-analyses have found that eating organically may lower risks of allergiescan cut energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

Plus, as the Stanford researchers found, organic produce had a 30 per cent lower risk of pesticide contamination than conventional fruits and vegetables.

This alone is enough for many, Ria’s family included. Her study put an end to their household debate. “All of our fresh produce is organic,” she said.

As for the public debate, Ria and the researchers would like to see studies extending from their own: “Our data suggest that organic foods provide improved health outcomes. The reason for this effect remains unclear.”

Environmental Working Group has just released this year’s Dirty Dozen Plus and Clean Fifteen; conventionally grown foods containing the most and least pesticide residue.

The Dirty Dozen Plus: Apples, celery, cherry tomatoes, cucumbers, grapes, hot peppers, nectarines, peaches, potatoes, spinach, strawberries, sweet bell peppers, kale and collard greens, zucchini.

The Clean Fifteen: Asparagus, avocados, cabbage, rockmelon, sweet corn, eggplant, grapefruit, kiwi, mangoes, mushrooms, papaya, onions, pineapples, sweet peas, sweet potatoes.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/diet-and-fitness/flying-in-the-face-of-the-organic-debate-20130424-2ietj.html#ixzz2RS2ekZq7

Thank you to our Soldiers, this ANZAC Day, 25th April 2013

Thank you to our soldiers, on this Anzac Day, 25th April 2013.

Thank you for risking your lives in far off lands. 

Had you not done that, generations ago, I, and thousands of genuine migrant refugee children, would not be calling this beautiful country of Australia their home. You helped defeat the enemies of freedom, and oppression. Enemies, that were racist, dogmatic, totalitarian, dictatorial, and against everything that freedom of choice stood for!

Politicians may have been the reason you brave souls went to war, but it was your heroism, your sacrifices, your endurance of hardships, and horrors, that the people of today, cannot begin, even in their wildest, terror filled nightmares, to comprehend, that made it all work. 

For as long as I live, I will be thankful to the Service men and women, who died, who were maimed, who suffered mentally, for their sacrifices, in far off lands, to protect our own shores.

LEST WE FORGET

Why is Islam such a destructive religion?

Let’s start with the Taliban, who have destroyed, priceless monuments carved, centuries ago, in cliff faces, by believers of their own religion, of Islam!!!   Why???

Why is it that all the 172 chapters of Islamic sects, hate each other?   Why???

Why is is it, that even in the absence of western persons, the Shi’ites wage cowardly attacks on their own people who share the religion of Islam, the Sunni’s, and vice-versa???   Why???

Who, or what, drives this insane hatred of anyone who does not agree with one mother-fucker, …oops, I meant camel-fucker, …oops, I meant mule, …oops, I think I meant Mullah?

And why is is that since the death of the Crusades, some 700 or 800 years ago, the people of Islam and the people of all other religions, lived together, in peace and harmony? Until recent times?   Why???

And now, all of a sudden, Islam hates everybody!!! Islam even hates itself!!! If that was not true, why attack other version of Islam???

WTF happened, to create this situation???  All of a sudden peaceful co-existence turned to COWARDLY attacks on the western world, and even on other versions of Islam itself!!!

And now we get to the COWARDLY acts of murderers. Acts of mass murder on unsuspecting, innocent, people, who are not even involved in the fight with Islam.

Irrespective of what one’s religious beliefs are, it is increasingly evident, that COWARDS have adopted Islam as their religion… Or is it that Islam, has created so many COWARDS among its believers?

Is it possible, that Islam has given natural COWARDS an half baked, insane, illogical, sense of a way to DISGUISE their COWARDICE, by promoting the slaughter of innocent persons, as a way to redeem their COWARDLY, WORTHLESS, individual existence, in the eyes of their, god?

No matter what the incentive, people who murder, innocent, unsuspecting, vulnerable people, are COWARDS. These people of Islam, are not terrorists! They are just COWARDS…

They do not even deserve the acknowledgement of being called terrorists…

It just seems to me, that Islam is a religion for displaced souls, for COWARDS, for insecure individuals…

But, having said all of the above, … I was going to say, … that the religion may be of benefit to some, but then… given that the religion is so fragmented, I cannot truly believe, that that there is a religion of Islam…

It can be done!

Read author Kim Stanley Robinson’s trilogy of Mar’s books. Red Mars, Green Mars, Blue Mars.

All directions are there! 
——————————————–

Fancy living on Mars? This reality show is for you

Date
April 23, 2013 – 11:19AM

It could be the plot to Avatar‘s sequel, but a Dutch ‘interplanetary media group’ is really looking for applicants who are willing to take a one-way trip to the red planet and face possibly lethal radiation, no growable food and cramped quarters for the rest of their lives.

An artist's impression of what the Mars One colony will look like in 2023.An artist’s impression of what the Mars One colony will look like in 2023. Photo: Mars One

Are you crazy enough to sign up for a one-way trip to Mars? Applications are being accepted by the makers of a Dutch reality show that says it will deliver the first humans to the red planet in 10 years.

The main requirements are strong health, good people and survival skills, being 18 or older, and having a reasonable grasp of the English language.

The company, called Mars One, aims to land its first four astronauts in 2023 for a televised reality show that would follow the exploits of the first humans to attempt to establish a colony on Mars.

Space odyssey 2023 ... Could man call Mars home? Even if it meant possible death on the red planet?Space odyssey 2023 … Could man call Mars home? Even if it meant possible death on the red planet?

Already, the organisers have received “10,000 emails from more than 100 different countries from people who are interested in joining us for this mission”, said founder Bas Lansdorp at a news conference in a New York hotel.

In all they are seeking six groups of four people each. A new group would make the seven-month journey every two years after the first crew departs in 2022.

The cost for the first mission is about $US6 billion ($A5.9 billion).

“It sounds like a lot of money. And actually it is a lot of money. But imagine what will happen when the first people land on Mars. Literally everybody on the globe will want to see it,” Lansdorp said.

The project has garnered plenty of sceptics but is backed by Dutch Nobel laureate Gerard ‘t Hooft, who won the 1999 prize for physics.

The world’s space agencies have only managed to send unmanned robotic rovers to Mars so far, the latest being NASA’s $US2.5 billion Curiosity rover that touched down in August 2012.

Major drawbacks to the proposed mission include the inability to return to Earth, the small living quarters and the lack of food on the dry planet. That is, if the radiation endured during the trip is not lethal, and if the volatile landing goes according to plan.

Key attributes for applicants, according to Mars One medical director Norbert Kraft, are being adaptable, resilient, creative and having empathy.

“Can you really work with other people from other countries, as a team?” he asked.

Many questions remain about how the astronauts would survive, breathe and drink on a planet with a temperature of minus 55C and whose atmosphere consists mainly of carbon dioxide.

But the company’s representatives insisted that they believe they are within ethical guidelines by pursuing their mission.

“The long-term aim is to have a lasting colony,” said Hooft. “This expansion will not be easy. How soon that will be accomplished is anyone’s guess today.”

AFP

And Abbott has the nerve to accuse Gillard of ‘Jobs for the Boys’???

I warn all Australian’s that a vote for Tony Abbott at the elections will bring down upon the populace, more hardship, that has ever been wrought by even the Liberal governments of Newman in Queensland, and Bailleu and Napthine in Victoria, where thousands of jobs have been lost, and billions cut from essential services such as the CFA, Health, and Ambulance Services, etc…

And for the very first time in my life, I have to make the comment, that based on the above facts, plus the fact that Abbott’s opposition has not made any policies available, and that’s Abbott’s opinion on current issues has changed by the hour, that I believe that only moron’s and exploiters of Australia’s resources, could possibly vote for an Abbott government, no matter how much animosity has been directed to the government of Gillard.

I cannot even begin, to comprehend, at this time, why Abbott and his government would be the preferred choice of the people! Abbott has not even released any information that is current, on any issues, never mind important ones, for more than an hour!

Are the people of this country, really, so very very stupid?
——————————————————————————————

Gillard should not appoint next GG: Abbott

Date
April 22, 2013
Mark Kenny

Mark Kenny

Chief political correspondent

View more articles from Mark Kenny

EXCLUSIVE

John Howard.John Howard. Photo: Paul Rovere

Tony Abbott has accused Prime Minister Julia Gillard of ”a blatant abuse of power” over the appointment of Australia’s next governor-general, despite there being no evidence of an announcement being made before the election.

The escalation in rhetoric has fuelled suspicions within the government that Mr Abbott wants to keep the position vacant so he can appoint his old boss and mentor John Howard to the role.

Fairfax Media has obtained a copy of a letter from Mr Abbott to Ms Gillard written on Sunday, expressly warning against her naming a replacement for Governor-General Quentin Bryce, whose term will end in March, 2014.

Ms Bryce’s five-year term has already been extended by six months to avoid any clash with the September election.

In the letter, Mr Abbott complains about the recent reappointment of the Australian Electoral Commissioner and other public service appointments, and invokes the ”caretaker” convention to suggest the current government is going beyond its legitimate authority.

”In my view, the decision to announce these appointments subverts the established convention that no government should make decisions that are legitimately the province of a potential successor,” he wrote in the letter dated April 21. ”The announcement of appointments expressed to take effect almost nine months into the term of the next parliament and some 15 months before they become operative is a blatant abuse of power.”

Mr Abbott argues that to attempt to recommend the appointment of a new governor-general more than six months before the term would commence is ”without modern precedent”.

”Quite properly, arrangements regarding the appointment of a new governor-general would be, and should be, a matter for a new or a returned prime minister after the September 14 election.

”Thus, I seek your specific assurance that this precedent will be respected and that arrangements for the appointment of a new governor-general will be a matter for an incoming or re-elected government.”

A senior government figure said it was believed Mr Abbott would seek to politicise the plum governor-general position by awarding it to former Coalition prime minister and avowed monarchist John Howard.

”Abbott has missed the point of due diligence,” the figure said. ”This is not just a matter of putting out a press release; we cannot afford another Peter Hollingworth.”

Speaking on Sky News on Sunday, Mr Abbott initially avoided direct reference to the governor-general’s post before conceding it was his view it should be left to the next prime minister.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/gillard-should-not-appoint-next-gg-abbott-20130421-2i8h7.html#ixzz2R6uoHxo8

BOSTON ARREST SPARKS DEBATE OVER READING OF RIGHTS

Yes, of course this person has rights!

He is entitled to the same rights he gave his innocent, unsuspecting victims!
——————————————————————————————————-

BOSTON ARREST SPARKS DEBATE OVER READING OF RIGHTS

AFPApril 21, 2013, 11:17 am

Boston bomb suspect in hospital

The Boston bombing suspect who was captured alive yesterday could face the death penalty. Nineteen-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev remains under police guard in hospital.

WASHINGTON (AFP) – The arrest of the Boston Marathon bombing suspect has ignited debate over a legal exception that allows police to interrogate individuals without reading them their rights.

The suspect, Dzokhar Tsarnaev, a 19-year-old naturalized US citizen, was in hospital to receive treatment for injuries he sustained during a shootout with police on Friday.

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick said the seriously wounded Tsarnaev was “not able to communicate yet,” hinting that he may not have been questioned so far.

But rights advocates were quick to express concern over possible efforts by President Barack Obama’s administration to use a provision waiving the need to inform Tsarnaev of his right to an attorney or to remain silent.

American Civil Liberties Union executive director Anthony Romero called for a narrow read of the “public safety” exception, which is only allowed in cases where there is a “continued threat” to public safety.

“We must not waver from our tried-and-true justice system, even in the most difficult of times,” he said in a statement.

“Denial of rights is un-American and will only make it harder to obtain fair convictions.”

Obama speaks after Boston arrest

US President Barack Obama speaks to the media after the successful arrest of the suspected Boston Marathon bomber.

 US Attorney Carmen Ortiz told reporters after Tsarnaev’s arrest that the authorities had invoked the public safety exception and delayed reading him his rights, or Miranda warning.

Republican lawmakers have gone a step further, arguing that Tsarnaev, an ethnic Chechen who lived in the United States for a decade, should be declared an “enemy combatant,” the same legal status as detainees being held at the Guantanamo military prison.

“A decision to not read Miranda rights to the suspect was sound and in our national security interests,” read a joint statement by Senators Lindsey Graham, John McCain, Kelly Ayotte and Representative Peter King.

“However, we have concerns that limiting this investigation to 48 hours and exclusively relying on the public safety exception to Miranda could very well be a national security mistake.”

But Senate Armed Service Committee Chairman Carl Levin, a Democrat, disagreed and expressed full confidence in the US justice system to try the suspect in federal civilian courts.

He warned that there was “no legal basis for his detention as an enemy combatant.”

“I am not aware of any evidence so far that the Boston suspect is part of any organized group, let alone Al-Qaeda, the Taliban or one of their affiliates — the only organizations whose members are subject to detention under the Authorization for Use of Military Force,” Levin said.

“To hold the suspect as an enemy combatant under these circumstances would be contrary to our laws and may even jeopardize our efforts to prosecute him for his crimes.”

Tsarnaev was caught after a massive manhunt that saw his older brother and fellow suspect Tamerlan killed.

FBI releases vision of bomb suspects

The FBI has released vision and images of two suspects in connection to the Boston Marathon bombings.

A 1966 Supreme Court ruling requires that police read suspects their Miranda rights, in order to protect them against involuntarily incriminating themselves.

Under normal rules, only comments made by a suspect who has been read his rights is able to be used in a subsequent trial.

The court created an exception in 1984 allowing police to interrogate a suspect without reading the rights if there is deemed to be an immediate threat to themselves or to the public.

In a 2010 policy memo, the FBI ordered agents to interrogate suspected “operational terrorists” about immediate threats to public safety without first advising them of their Miranda rights.

Use Dropbox? Worried about security? Read this!

Read this even if you are not worried about security.

But do you store passwords, logon details, personal details on your computer?

Hmmm, then perhaps you should still read this article posted on the TechRepublic site.
—————————————————————————————————————————————-

DropSmack: Using Dropbox to steal files and deliver malware

April 15, 2013, 7:46 AM PDT

Takeaway: Michael P. Kassner interviews a digital forensic scientist who uses Dropbox to compromise targeted networks — something the bad guys probably figured out as well.

I use Dropbox, and so do some 50 million other people. That’s remarkable, considering Dropbox suffered through a few embarrassing speed bumps related to user file security. It seems it’s going to take more than those kind of oops for us to consider giving up the convenience afforded by Dropbox.A digital addiction like that begs the question: what kind of “issue” would it take to convince someone (me for instance) to stop using Dropbox?When I asked that question at a security seminar, little did I realize a digital investigator slash pen tester would provide the perfect speed bump that will have all 50 million of us asking ourselves, “Is using Dropbox worth the risk?”

What issue?

I was perusing the seminar briefing website from this year’s Black Hat EU, fishing for potential article topics, when I came across a briefing note titled “DropSmack: How cloud synchronization services render your corporate firewall worthless.” Feeling a nibble, I read the briefing. Right away, I knew I hooked a keeper:

“The contributions of this presentation are threefold. First, we show how cloud-based synchronization solutions in general, and Dropbox in particular, can be used as a vector for delivering malware to an internal network.”

The other two contributions were as eye-opening:

  • Show how the Dropbox synchronization service can be used as a Command and Control (C2) channel.
  • Demonstrate how functioning malware is able to use Dropbox to smuggle out data from exploited remote computers.

I’d like to introduce Mr. Jacob Williams (@MalwareJake). Jake is a highly skilled pen tester and digital forensic scientist employed by CSR Group. He’s the guy who gave the Black Hat presentation, and he’s the one who is going to cause significant angst among Dropbox users as well as corporate-security types.

The events as they unfolded

As the story goes, Jake was hired to perform a “no holds barred” penetration test on a corporate network. Nothing Jake tried worked, even social engineering the employees. Then Jake found a crack — the company CIO. He obtained a personal email address and a way to spear-phish the CIO.

He just had to wait until the CIO used his work notebook away from the corporation’s highly secure network. In less time than one would expect (scary actually), Jake owned the notebook.

While snooping around on the CIO’s computer, Jake couldn’t believe his luck; he found corporate documents quietly sitting in a Dropbox synchronization folder. Jake told me, “I knew I could use Dropbox as a conduit into the inner corporate sanctuary. What I didn’t know was how.”

That’s because Dropbox databases are encrypted; and reverse engineering the Dropbox software in order to read the databases would take longer than Jake had. Not to be denied, Jake and his cohorts eventually discovered a way in. It seems massive quantities of beer played a vital role (from Jake’s Black Hat presentation).

The epiphany

By design, Dropbox would allow Jake to send files to all the devices associated with the CIO’s Dropbox account, but that’s not enough. Jake needed a way to infiltrate further into the company network, install malware, and find specific documents as part of the pen-test requirements.

Figuring out how to accomplish all that was Jake’s epiphany, and like any good pen tester wanting to get unstuck, Jake created a tool called DropSmack to perform the above steps.

Next step was getting it loaded. Jake realized all he had to do was get the CIO to open a file infected with DropSmack in his Dropbox folder, and it would install. Here are the steps:

  • Embed DropSmack in a file already synchronized by Dropbox.
  • Add some macro goodness.
  • Load file back on the compromised computer.
  • File automatically synchronizes.
  • Wait for the victim to open the file on the internal network.

I thought I had a gotcha; I asked Jake, “What about Windows 7 and needing admin rights to get by the UAC?” Jake told me something I should have known, but didn’t, “Dropbox does not need admin rights to load, because it installs into the user’s profile directory. So we did the same thing with DropSmack — nice and simple.” Something else I didn’t understand: “Now that DropSmack is installed, how do you tell it what to do?” Jake explained:

DropSmack is designed to monitor the Dropbox synchronization folder. We create a file using a .doc extension, put a legitimate file header on the first line, and add the desired commands. Our files won’t open in Word (they say the file is corrupted); but that’s good, it makes the file less prone to investigation by a snoopy user.

We then place the doctored file in the owned computer’s Dropbox folder. Dropbox does it magic synchronizing all associated Dropbox folders. DropSmack detects the file meant for it, and executes the command.

I then asked Jake for a few examples of what DropSmack was capable of doing:

Once you infect a remote machine with DropSmack, it can be used to perform arbitrary actions on the machine. This includes pivoting to other machines in the remote network (such as a file server). Using the PUT command, you can upload any new tools you may need to the remote machine. The EXEC command allows you to execute those tools. The GET command allows you to retrieve output from any commands that was written to an output file.

To get remote shares mounted to a machine, you’d just upload a batch script containing the “net use” command that outputs to an output file, EXEC the script, and retrieve the output file. I demonstrated this live at the Black Hat EU conference, capturing a listing of the user’s home directory, IP configurations, and the Program Files directory (to see what software was installed on the machine).

Jake beat me to the punch on my next question. I wondered if the notifications Dropbox created would seem odd to the user.

So, for now, Jake makes sure the name of the command file relates to the files already in Dropbox.

Countermeasures

Next, Jake and I discussed how to foil DropSmack. Jake didn’t have much regard for normal antimalware methods: such as IDS, firewalls, antivirus apps, or DLP software. He felt whitelisting software was the only for sure way to prevent DropSmack from loading.

More importantly, Jake suggested that security managers think long and hard before allowing Dropbox or any file-synchronization application, no matter how convenient they are. Besides the more obvious reasons for disallowing file-synchronizing apps, Jake alluded to the “can of worms” companies can find themselves in regarding privacy laws. He explained:

Many general counsels are more than a little worried about the appearance of authorizing us to pen test what could end up being be home machines. That’s becoming a sticky issue with pen-testers these days as people open spear phishing emails delivered to the corporate email addresses on machines that may be privately owned.

Jake also pointed out:

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act doesn’t allow the corporation to authorize testing of an employee’s personal assets. Usually penetration testers solve this problem (and avoid breaking the law) by only acting on malware from machines in the corporation’s public IP range.

The liability issue resulting from privacy laws affects more than just pen testers; companies allowing file synchronization apps are apt to get embroiled in issues similar to the legal implications of BYOD.

Final thoughts

Jake and I felt it important to mention that Dropbox is by far the most secure of all file synchronization applications that Jake looked at. In fact, he uses Dropbox personally (at least he did before finding the issue). Jake also wanted me to make sure and mention that Dropbox was not compromised in order to accomplish his pen-testing goal. It was just a conduit.

A few more interesting tidbits from Jake:

  • More often than not, Dropbox is loaded on corporate networks whether it is approved or not — most of the time it’s not.
  • It’s a good bet the bad guys know this technique, and are already using it.

The article may make it seem that DropSmack is more of a corporate concern, but that is not necessarily so. Once DropSmack or similar malware becomes mainstream in bad-guy circles, it’s everyone’s concern.

Get IT Tips, news, and reviews delivered directly to your inbox by subscribing to TechRepublic’s free newsletters.

Michael Kassner

About Michael Kassner

Michael Kassner is currently a systems manager for an international company. Together with his son, they run MKassner Net, a small IT publication consultancy.

Alan Jones (the radio presenter, not the racing driver) would have to be one of the biggest idiots of all time!

I simply cannot believe that there are so many people in this country, whose intelligence is so low, that they need an idiot like this Jones, to bring some joy? reason for living? into their lives.

This creature from the ‘Stupid Lagoon’, has so many times, uttered such stupidity from his mouth, that why anyone still listens to him, boggles the mind.

That he professes to know more than all the law enforcement agencies in the USA, about the Boston bombings, must surely be, beyond the comprehension of any person capable of rational thinking.
———————————————————————-

Alan Jones suggests ‘left-wing radical students’ link to Boston bombing

Date
April 17, 2013 – 1:29PM

Jones suggests ‘left-wing student conspiracy’

2GB Radio host Alan Jones points to Boston’s student population as the likely source of the perpetrator of Boston Marathon bombings.

Broadcaster Alan Jones is facing an online backlash after suggesting on national television that “left-wing radical students” were behind the Boston Marathon bombings and that Australia should reconsider its intake of foreign university students in response.

Really, you just said that Alan Jones? I have no words…

In a segment on Channel Seven’s Sunrise on Wednesday morning, the controversial 2GB host said Boston was a student city home to prestigious institutions such as Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and suggested that students could be the culprits.

Controversial comments: Alan Jones appears on Sunrise on Wednesday morning.That is despite US authorities saying they do not have any suspects in the case and they do not know who is responsible for the blasts. No organisation has claimed responsibility for the attack that killed three people and injured more than 175.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if this was a conspiracy amongst students, left-wing radical students in Boston, and I think we have to think also very seriously here about our own student numbers,” Jones said on Sunrise.

“We’re very keen to have foreign students pay the way of universities in this country without a lot of discernment about who comes in. But I think the fact that we’ve been spared this kind of thing, touch wood, for so long highlights, as I said, the relentless work done by ASIO and all our police organisations.”

Alan JonesAlan Jones: “We’re very keen to have foreign students pay the way of universities in this country without a lot of discernment about who comes in.” Photo: Jim Rice

Former NSW treasurer Michael Costa, who was also on the segment, immediately responded that people shouldn’t “jump to conclusions yet about what’s behind all of this. Let the American authorities deal with it”.

“You know, America has got a history of domestic terrorism unrelated to the sort of broader jihadists’ terrorist movement and we don’t want to jump to conclusions,” Mr Costa said.

“But for Australia the lesson is clear. Complacency can’t be tolerated. We’ve got to support our authorities and we’ve got to ensure we’re vigilant.”

Jones responded that there were “a lot of things here that we can’t be told”.

“I think governments here have been very good in dealing with all of this and I think they will continue to be very good,” he said.

“This was a very sophisticated attack, this wasn’t the work of amateurs and there were several bombs designed to do damage in big numbers and I’m sure Australian authorities are alerted to all that.”

The online response to Jones’ comments was swift and damning:

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/alan-jones-suggests-leftwing-radical-students-link-to-boston-bombing-20130417-2hz8y.html#ixzz2QjZAiM5q

Who keeps breeding these COWARDS???

People who attack innocent, unsuspecting, vulnerable people are not terrorists. They are just murderous cowards, and should be referred to as such.

And when these cowards are finally caught, they demand more rights, than any of the victims received.

I say, do not give them any more rights than with their cowardly acts, they gave their victims. And then, let the punishment fit the crime. That seems to be the only thing that these cowards understand.
———————————————————————-

FIFTEEN CRITICAL AFTER BOSTON ATTACK
Jimmy Golen, agencies, AAP
April 16, 2013, 1:11 pm  Boston Marathon

At least three people are dead and more than a hundred injured, after two bombs exploded near the finish line of the Boston Marathon.

The two bombs that exploded in the crowded streets near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, have killed at least three people and injured more than 130 in a bloody scene of shattered glass and severed limbs, raising alarms terrorists might have struck again in the US.

A White House official speaking on condition of anonymity because the investigation was still unfolding said the attack was being treated as an act of terrorism.

President Barack Obama vowed that those responsible will “feel the full weight of justice.”

As many as two unexploded bombs were also found near the end of the 42-kilometre course as part of what appeared to be a well-coordinated attack, but they were safely disarmed, according to a senior US intelligence official, who also spoke on condition of anonymity because of the continuing investigation.

The fiery twin blasts took place almost simultaneously and about 100 metres apart, knocking spectators and at least one runner off their feet, shattering windows and sending dense plumes of smoke rising over the street and through the fluttering national flags lining the course.

When the second bomb went off, the spectators’ cheers turned to screams. As sirens blared, emergency workers and National Guardsmen assigned to the race for crowd control began climbing over and tearing down temporary fences to get to the blast site.

A pool of blood formed, and huge shards were missing from window panes as high as three stories.

“They just started bringing people in with no limbs,” said runner Tim Davey, of Virginia. He said he and his wife, Lisa, tried to keep their children’s eyes shielded from the gruesome scene inside a medical tent that had been set up to care for fatigued runners, but “they saw a lot.”

Boston police said three people were killed. Hospitals reported at least 134 injured, at least 15 of them critically. The injuries ranged from cuts and bruises to amputations. Many victims suffered lower leg injuries and shrapnel wounds. Some suffered ruptured eardrums.

Reports continue to come in of the horrific injuries doctors are dealing with in the aftermath of the bombings.

One Boston doctor said many victims were wounded with ball bearings, meaning bombs were designed for maximum damage.

A doctor from Brigham and Women’s Hospital has also addressed the media.

He says the 31 blast patients at the hospital have been tested for any traces of biological residue from the blast but he says they have found none.

“It’s routine to make sure that patients are not contaminated. The contaminant [that we are looking] for in this instance is radiation,” he said.

“We have not had any deaths here. We are not anticipating any deaths, but in this first 24-hour period there is some instability.

“These are blast-type injuries, very high force, they cause a lot of damage to tissue and to bone.”

Some 23,000 runners took part in the race, one of the world’s oldest and most prestigious marathons, which attracts more than 500,000 spectators and winds up in the heart of central Boston, near the landmark Prudential Center and the Boston Public Library. It is held on Patriots Day, a Massachusetts state holiday which commemorates the first battles of the American Revolution in 1775.

Obama Vows to Find Who’s Behind Boston Blasts
President Barack Obama, responding to the explosions at the Boston Marathon, says the United States does not know “who did this or why” but vowed that whoever is responsible “will feel the full weight of justice.” (April 15)
The Federal Aviation Administration barred low-flying aircraft from within 5.6 kilometres of the site.

Obama was briefed on the explosions by Homeland Security adviser Lisa Monaco. Obama also told Boston Mayor Tom Menino and Governor Deval Patrick that his administration would provide whatever support was needed, the White House said.

“We still don’t know who did this or why,” Obama said, adding, “Make no mistake: We will get to the bottom of this.”

Bystanders tend to an injured man following explosions at the Boston Marathon. Photo: Reuters

The Federal Aviation Administration created a no-fly zone over the site of the explosions, and briefly ordered flights bound for Boston’s Logan International Airport held on the ground at airports around the US

A few kilometres away from the finish line and around the same time, a fire broke out at the John F. Kennedy presidential library. The police commissioner said it may have been caused by an incendiary device but didn’t appear to be related to the bombings.

A man comforts a victim on the sidewalk at the scene of the first explosion.

The first loud explosion occurred on the north side of Boylston Street, just before the photo bridge that marks the finish line. The second explosion could be heard a few seconds later.

They occurred about four hours into the race and two hours after the men’s winner crossed the line. By that point, more than 17,000 of the runners had finished the race, but thousands of others were farther back along the course.

A senior US intelligence official said the two other explosive devices found nearby were being dismantled. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to discuss the findings publicly.

Australian athletes describe Boston horror

Australian athletes Kurt Fearnley and Jeff Hunt were at the Boston Marathon when the bombs detonated. They describe the scene on the ground.
Australian athletes reveal bomb horror

It is described as the Holy Grail of marathons, and for many of the 153 Australians lining up with the more than 24,000 other runners for Boston’s great race, it was a dream come true.

Just hours later, at the finish line where they expected to raise their hands in triumph, two bombs believed to be loaded with ball-bearings ripped through the crowd, killing three people – including an eight-year-old boy – and maiming more than 120 others.

It should have been a wonderful day for Australia.

Australia’s number one ranked marathoner Jeff Hunt finished eighth in the men’s race, another Aussie, Lee Troop came 15th, while Paralympians Kurt Fearnley and Christie Dawes came fifth in their respective wheelchair races.

Marathon man Robert de Castella, Olympic marathoner Benita Willis and triathlete champion Greg Welch were among the big name Australians in Boston for what is America’s oldest and most prestigious marathon.

The moment an of the blast at the finish line of the Boston marathon. Photo: AAP

Also in the pack were other familiar names, including Gill Stapleton, head of Special Olympics Australia, and Helen Carmody, principal of exclusive Victorian girls’ private school, Toorak College.

“The Boston Marathon is truly the Holy Grail of marathons,” Ms Stapleton, who was running alongside Ms Carmody just 700 metres from the finish line, told AAP.

“Helen was on track to do a personal best and I was doing my sixth marathon in five years.

“It was a big moment for us, but then runners started stopping and we didn’t know what was going on.”

Word soon filtered through about the carnage ahead.

Elsewhere, many of the Australian contingent were physically rocked by the blast.

Hunt had finished the course and was back in his hotel room, de Castella was in the race’s media centre when he was jolted while Fearnley was at a nearby restaurant.

He immediately sent out a Tweet.

“Couple of freaky explosions from the marathon finishing line,” Fearnley wrote.

Later, when he discovered the cause and destruction left on the street, Fearnley said he was “sickened”.

Despite the destruction and the number of Australian runners and spectators, it appears no Australians were injured, with Australian consulate staff checking hospitals to ensure this was the case.

There were initial fears for Emma Cameron, a member of de Castella’s Indigenous Marathon Project, when she could not be located on the course, but de Castella, who won the race in 1986 relieved the fears when he later announced she was safe.

Social media, often criticised, again proved itself in the confusing hours after the explosions, with the Australians able to communicate with each other via Twitter and Facebook to ensure they were safe.

With reports of other unexploded devices found around the city and police searching for a rental van, possibly loaded with explosives, that attempted to enter the race course, Boston was on lockdown.

Ms Stapleton described it as “a city in chaos” while Hunt summed up the feeling among the Aussies.
“This is a despicable thing to have been done on such a glorious day,” he said.